The other primary reasons for selecting Linux are that it is modularly configurable to a relatively fine granularity, and it offers excellent API-level compatibility amongst different platforms that are popular for high-end (32-bit and larger) embedded cores: PPC, ARM, x86, and MIPS.Tails is a multi-purpose Linux distribution that we’ve talked about a couple of times in the past. This goal cannot be fulfilled on top of Mac OS. The foremost reason is that it is a design goal for this project to be entirely open source. Advice is presented in good faith, but what works for one may not work for all.This series uses the Linux operating system for a couple of reasons. The idea of open source software is very appealing to me I'd love to try it out first on another system (like a raspbery pie) but I wanted to ask you guys here what you think.MkLinux, PowerPC only distro (PowerPC 601-604 Macs, Kanga and WallStreet. Hi all, I have researched this for a bit but still am not convinced whether I should try and install ubuntu on my mac mini.I eventually chose Yellow Dog Linux 4.0.1 because the standard disk set is a smaller download (four CD images), and, more importantly, this distribution resembles Fedora very closely. Debian (available in Resources) weighs in at a svelte nine gigabyte download, or fourteen CD images, although you don’t actually need all of those disks. The OS is so good at protecting against surveillance and censorship that even famed whistleblower Edward Snowden recommended on multiple occasions over the years.I experimented with a few distributions of Linux for PowerPC platforms.Launch Disk Utility.I thought the article is well-written, and people will actually do that. All you need is a USB drive of a least 2GB in size and an internet connection to get started. You needn't throw out the baby with the bathwater and wipe your old Mac's hard drive clean before trying it out. Whether you have an older system with 256 MB of RAM, or a top of the line battle station, this subreddit is the best spot to get sound advice from the GNU/Linux community.See how well Ubuntu Linux runs on your Mac. The application you’ll build in this series will run happily on practically any distribution.”This place is dedicated to finding exactly which GNU/Linux distribution, also known as a distro, is right for you. I had no compelling technical reason to choose Yellow Dog, and if you’re more comfortable with another distribution, feel free to use it as you follow along with this series.
Best Linux Distro Mini Driver To MakeNot good at all.Good thing is: when the tester tires of Linux, they can always erase the hard disk and install Mac OS X and get some work done.And the total lack of a need to find voodoo priests dancing to juju to get a driver to make whatever-wasn’t-working-under-Linux work, will be a bittersweet wake up too. When it comes down to it, it’s plenty Samba is broken on Mac OS, why not fix it?On installing other OSs on a Mac… I had a bad dream once (really) that I booted my Mac and up came the Windows desktop… not good. FireWire, Bluetooth, the fan motor to name but a few.It’ actually good to see that the reviled puny performer I have seen the MacMini be called by some isn’t such a bad combination after all. A Kodi Entertainment Center distribution.I do wonder about what features you’re going to break for lack of decent drivers. Compatible with: PC and Mac.The last time I looked at the development side of Gnome most were opting to develop with QT or Java. Are modular kernel extensions compatible with most or even some distros rather than vendor specific? Again – an honest question.Quite, actually. This is an honest question. Yet how much of this superior collection of drivers is available as modules under Linux. I’ve heard of countless modular systems and worked with many just the same. Yes I know about GnuStep and I can’t say I know a single person who has managed to get it working without significant issues. So from the perspective of building custom functionality in terms of userland applictions OS X’s XCode+Objective-C+Cocoa beats the pants off of anything I’ve seen under Linux. Can’t rightly say that for C++ or even C. When you look at software development OS X supports most of the existing architectures supported under Linux in addition to having first class support for J2SE, and a few things that can’t be found on Linux such as Cocoa, Carbon, etc.When it comes to adding custom functionality Objective-C can be easily learned in the span of a week. If you want to talk about the Kernel I’d gladly argue that point. Download photoshop cc portable for macAre modular kernel extensions compatible with most or even some distros rather than vendor specific? Again – an honest question.”Basically any device driver can be compiled as a module. This is an honest question. *cough* Carbon and the pascalish notions found throughout *cough*You are so uninformed that I don’t even know where to begin correcting you — you’re entitled to an opinion but you shouldn’t expect anyone to take you seriously when you spew this drivel.“Yet how much of this superior collection of drivers is available as modules under Linux. So from the perspective of building custom functionality in terms of userland applictions OS X’s XCode+Objective-C+Cocoa beats the pants off of anything I’ve seen under Linux. Can’t rightly say that for C++ or even C. When you look at software development OS X supports most of the existing architectures supported under Linux in addition to having first class support for J2SE, and a few things that can’t be found on Linux such as Cocoa, Carbon, etc.When it comes to adding custom functionality Objective-C can be easily learned in the span of a week. If you want to talk about the Kernel I’d gladly argue that point. If you want to talk about the Kernel I’d gladly argue that point. Not a hell of a lot of people still write userland apps in c, you’re mischaractarizing linux development.Anonymous Depends on your meaning of customization as I noted above. Yes, many apps are written in c/c++, but bindings for all the popular gui toolkits are also available in languages like ruby, python, etc which, though I have some respect for obj-c, beat the pants off of obj-c. *cough* Carbon and the pascalish notions found throughout *cough*””Saying that linux app development = c/c++ displays, again, your incredible ignorance. Of course the same can be said for a lot of development platforms on both sides of the fence. Anyone who tells you can learn framework X in 21 days, just wants to sell you a book. Can’t rightly say that for C++ or even C.Hold up! You can learn Objective-C in one week, but you can’t learn C in the same time period? Isn’t Objective-C a superset of C? In my experience, in takes weeks, months or even years to become proficient in programming languages/frameworks. Apple, by and large, determines what you can or can’t do with their OS.Anonymous When it comes to adding custom functionality Objective-C can be easily learned in the span of a week. This kind of flexibility or customizability is just unheard of on OS X, or just outright unrealistic. You can build the whole operating system up from nothing to suit your particular task, case in point Google. You can build Linux to run as a multimedia workstation, desktop platform, server platform, clustered platform to run on old hardware, your xbox, your PDA, etc. I’ve worked with Python, Ruby, Perl, etc, etc ad nauseum and I am aware of their cross-platform capability (read as: they run on Linux). I never suggested GTK wasn’t successful or unpopular.In regards to development I didn’t say C/C++ was the only means of developing on Linux, did I? In fact I even made mention of a nice set of frameworks that use Objective-C on Linux. Especially given the robust, well tested, popular, portable alternatives, such as GTK+ and Qt.Because I doubt the validity of a concept you enjoy I should just go away? Because we don’t share a common point of view I should just disappear? How Hitlerian of you.That’s quite interesting regarding what can be done in the Linux kernel as far as modularity but here is another question – how often are device drivers compiled as such and made available in a manner suitable for the average end-user?The comment about QT was in regards to the popularity of Gnome for development the last time I was at all interested in Linux dev. Perhaps XCode+Objective-C+Cocoa is great of OS X development, but how does that make it great for Linux development? What is the criteria for measuring the pant beating?Anonymous es I know about GnuStep and I can’t say I know a single person who has managed to get it working without significant issues.That’s right, because no one in their right mind will use it for any serious development. You are comparing apples to oranges. It takes a lot of hardwork, study and experience to become proficient in any framework, on any OS.Anonymous So from the perspective of building custom functionality in terms of userland applictions OS X’s XCode+Objective-C+Cocoa beats the pants off of anything I’ve seen under Linux.You lost me here.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorCarla ArchivesCategories |